Gamma-Aware Ordered Dithering

I’ve been playing around with taking regular “8 bits per RGB (Red, Green, Blue) channel” images and reducing their bit depth. In the extreme case, 1 bit per channel gives us only 8 choices for each pixel: black, red, green, blue, cyan, magenta, yellow and white, all fully saturated.

The simplest way to do the conversion is to just take the high bit of each 8-bit value and quantize to either 0x00 or 0xFF. Here’s an example with the original image (re-scaled from the Art Institute of Chicago’s CC0 Public Domain Designation licensed photo of William Glackens’ “At Mouquin’s”) in the middle and the converted image on the left. This pairing is also Figure 2a in the appendix.


The left hand image is a poor approximation of the original image. Amongst its other deficiencies, it’s also noticably brighter. This is because of gamma correction (or the lack of it). As the “Gamma-aware image dithering” blog post says:

On the 8-bit scale that ranges from 0 to 255, on typical displays designed for gamma 2.2 or sRGB, the midpoint value 127.5 is not 50% the brightness of 255 – it’s actually about 22% of the brightness. The implication is that if we approximate the gray value 127.5 by alternating between white and black pixels, then we need 22% of the pixels to be white, not 50% of them.

In visual terms:


With the default gamma of 2.2, an area that alternates equally between #000000 black and #FFFFFF white pixels appears much brighter than an area that is uniformly #808080 medium gray. This is demonstrated by the Checkerboard images in the appendix.

One way to reduce the gap between “the average of the exponential transform” and “the exponential transform of the average” is to quantize to more bits. When approximating pow(0.5, 2.2), the average of pow(0.33, 2.2) and pow(0.67, 2.2) is much closer than the average of pow(0.00, 2.2) and pow(1.00, 2.2). Visually, a “2 bits per channel” quantization is much closer to the original image, in terms of brightness, than the “1 bit per channel” version above.



That doesn’t necessarily mean that it’s a better image. There’s now some weird green artifact on the tablecloth. It turns out that colors like #BAC6BB (i.e. light gray) in the original image gets quantized to #AAFFAA (i.e. light green) or, equivalently, rgb(0.67, 1.00, 0.67). When taking the high N bits (N=2 here), 0xBF versus 0xC0 is a hard cut-off.

Dithering is the classic approach to avoiding these hard cut-off artifacts. The blog post linked to earlier discusses a simple dithering algorithm (in a gamma-aware manner):

The simple algorithm presented above [in the blog post] merely dumps the approximation error to the next pixel to the right… It’s also possible to implement gamma-aware ordered dithering with some careful thought.

Having done some careful thought (and also having read the more recent “Ditherpunk — The article I wish I had about monochrome image dithering” blog post which does do ordered dithering, but only for 1 bit per channel and only for 1 channel: black/white), I now have some code to share (a command line tool and Go library) to perform gamma-aware, blue-noise (ordered) dithering.

Here’s the reduction to 1 (top) and 2 (bottom) bits per channel, with naive (left) and gamma-aware (right) dithering. The top-left image is still brighter than the middle (original). The bottom-left image is also brighter, but it’s not as obvious (focus on the woman’s dark hat and the man’s dark jacket). The difference between naive and gamma-aware quantization isn’t really noticable at 3, 4 or higher bits per channel. But it certainly stands out at a bit depth of 1. For technical reasons (the MarkDown that this blog post was written in doesn’t allow explicit CSS styling of HTML images), these “At Mouquin’s” images are best viewed in the appendix.



Published: 2022-09-25